About the video: heres the latest bollocks from lawson WITH MY COMMENTS NOW ADDED FROM MY NAUDET FAKE AUDIO PROOF VIDEO UPDATING LA LA

this video simply disproves the audio despite your eloquence YOU ARE FULL OF S**T.

THIS IS ME & MY FACE - NOW SHOW ME YOURS OR FUCK OFF - WE WANT TO PROTECT OUR CHILDREN !!!!!!

SHOW YOURSELF !! ARE YOU STILL HIDING????

no I am not accusing the firemen of being anything other than freaking heros , its because of true heroism that many little people like myself feel so compelled to not let it drop , so I disgust you .....

Posted 8 hours ago by lawson911 You don't get it, do you. You are following Simon Shack's "September Clues" and other video posters who are stating that there was no real plane in the Naudet video; that it was an added graphic. That is what your title indicates. So try to follow more...this logic:

1. If there was no plane in that shot, but the firemen reacted to something. Were they acting hearing and seeing something?

2. If there was no plane, and it was later graphically added to the video, and none of the firemen who were at the scene told anyone of this: their station commander, the police or the FBI, for example, that would mean that they were a part of a conspiracy to defraud the entire nation, as well as the rest of the world, because that video was played on TV, either on the evening of 9/11, or on the following day, and represented as being genuine video of the first plane to strike either of the Twin Towers.

3. If there was a plane, and you are saying that there was not, you are defaming firemen of the FDNY; the Naudet brothers; their producer, and anyone else who was connected to the production of that video, by implying that they used doctored video when they did not.

4. This gets very close to calling them all murderers, because you are saying that they knew that something bad was going to happen to the North Tower, but they did not report the fact that they knew.

So if, as you say you are not libelling the firemen and therefore not libelling the Naudet brothers, either, why don’t you take your foolishly titled video off this website?

Posted Jan 18, 08 by lawson911 Libelling the Naudet brothers seems to be a growing industry, but you are also accusing the firemen of being a part of a conspiracy which caused the deaths of so many of their colleagues. Some of the firemen who were in the documentary, which the more...Naudet brothers were making, may have either died or are still suffering from the effects of smoke and dust inhalation. Whether you realise it or not, you cannot accuse the Naudets without also accusing the firemen involved. It goes like this:

“If the firemen did not see the plane, but acted out their parts as though they did—including the shocked gasps and the voice exclaiming: ‘Holy shit!’—but did not come forward on the day, or after so many years, they must have been co-conspirators.”

That is what you are saying, by implication, and to even suggest this puts you beyond contempt, along with Simon Shack, Les Raphael and the other purveyors of vicious innuendo, such as Ace Baker and James Fetzer of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, who regularly suggest, on websites as well as radio programmes, that the Naudets and, therefore, those firemen, were complicit in faking the video, on the grounds that their being there was too much of a coincidence not to have been a set up. But none of them can provide a single, solid shred of evidence to back up their claims.

“spiney”, or whatever you real name is, I am calling the attention of the New York Fire Department to this video, and to all of the other videos which implicitly accuse these brave and dedicated men of being part of a conspiracy which took the lives of over 3,000 people, on 9/11, and which has caused many more deaths and untold suffering since.

You disgust me.